When a cup of fortified Purple Grape Jelly drink was almost finished, a large insect was found wrapped in the pearl toppings—an experience that left the consumer both nauseated and frightened. Even more surprising, during compensation negotiations with the ChaPanda merchant, although the other party eventually verbally agreed to pay 1,000 yuan, they required the consumer to sign an agreement and delete related posts and comments. The consumer believed this move was an attempt to portray them as a malicious claimant and refused to sign. Both sides stuck to their own accounts, and the local food and drug administration has also intervened and summoned the parties. How will this food safety dispute ultimately end? What obstacles did the consumer encounter on the path to defending their rights? This article sorts out the entire process of the incident for you. [more…]

Recently, a consumer reported on the Paper complaint platform that a greenish foreign object was found at the bottom of a cup of a beverage purchased at a Luckin Coffee store in Haikou, which the store confirmed to be a component of the direct drinking water outlet. The consumer demanded 1,000 yuan in compensation in accordance with the Food Safety Law, while the store offered five free cups of coffee, and the two sides failed to reach an agreement. The incident sparked discussions among netizens about Luckin's sincerity in handling the matter and food safety. Luckin's official customer service responded that it attaches great importance to the matter and will assign dedicated staff to handle it, but did not give a clear compensation plan. Front Street Coffee reminds that food safety is no small matter, and brands need to strictly fulfill their legal responsibilities and strengthen risk monitoring and prevention. [more…]

Luckin Coffee experienced abnormally low-priced orders on the Ele.me platform due to an operational configuration error. After a large number of users rushed to place orders, Luckin handled the situation by unilaterally canceling orders and temporarily suspending online operations. This move sparked strong dissatisfaction among consumers and also drew attention from the legal community: lawyers on one side argued that canceling paid orders was suspected of infringing on consumer rights; the other side pointed out that if it was a major misunderstanding, the contract could be revoked in accordance with the law. If there was intentional malicious marketing, it could also constitute fraud. In the end, Luckin promised to bear all losses and issue compensatory vouchers. This article sorts out the course of the incident, netizen feedback, and lawyers' views, so that coffee lovers can understand the full picture of this controversy. [more…]

Recently, a 1 Dian Dian store at Jinshijie in Dongmen, Shenzhen was exposed after a cockroach leg was found in a milk tea, sparking widespread attention. The consumer and the store failed to reach an agreement on compensation, and a complaint has now been filed and accepted on the Shenzhen government service platform. The incident highlights weak links in food safety management in the tea beverage industry and once again reminds industry practitioners and consumers to pay joint attention to hygiene issues. As an industry observer, Front Street Coffee continues to monitor the impact of such incidents on brand trust. [more…]

Recently, a leak about Manner Coffee's discounted wages during the pandemic sparked heated discussion on social media. The leak claimed that Manner required employees to choose between two compensation options: hourly basic pay, or 80% of Shanghai's minimum wage of 2,072 yuan. The incident quickly trended on Weibo, and Manner subsequently issued a statement identifying two former employees as having made false claims, and said it had reported the matter to police to pursue criminal and civil liability. The statement also detailed wage payment standards during the pandemic, saying its treatment was far above Shanghai's minimum wage, and implicitly suggested that employees of competitor Mstand Coffee were involved. This article reviews the course of the incident, both sides' accounts, and lawyers' views, and explores the legality of barista pay during the pandemic and the state of the industry. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, posted on social media claiming to have疑似 found fragments of an insect carcass in a takeaway milk tea from the well-known freshly made tea drink brand KOI. The consumer and the brand failed to reach an agreement after multiple communications over compensation and an apology, and the consumer has filed a complaint with 12315 and insists on pursuing legal proceedings. KOI responded that neither the store surveillance nor inspections by the market supervision department found any foreign object entering the drink, and that the strainer hole design of the shaker cup would also block such foreign objects, so it does not accept an apology on the platform but is willing to compensate in accordance with the law. The incident has attracted widespread attention, with both sides sticking to their own accounts, and there is currently no new progress. [more…]

Starbucks is facing a labor law lawsuit over scheduling violations in New York City, with an investigation finding more than 500,000 violations of the Fair Workweek Law, ultimately resulting in a $38.9 million settlement. The case involved more than 15,000 employees, making it the largest worker rights settlement in New York City history. Starbucks was accused of failing to provide stable schedules, cutting hours, and refusing overtime, making it difficult for employees to make a living, while the company said the settlement was intended to ensure compliance rather than to recover unpaid wages. Front Street Coffee brings you the full story. [more…]

Recently, the well-known Guangzhou tea beverage company Chali Group has been exposed by multiple netizens for allegedly owing employee wages and housing provident fund contributions, sparking widespread attention. According to a report by Yangcheng Evening News, some employees reported that their salaries for August and September were long overdue, and although the personal housing provident fund portion was deducted from their wages, it was not actually paid. In addition, some job applicants claimed that the company conducted unauthorized personal credit checks on them. Although Chali responded that some of the information was untrue and said it had communicated with the poster and reached an agreement, discussions about the unpaid wages continue to intensify on social platforms, and the truth of the matter and subsequent developments are worth watching. [more…]

Recently, a netizen claimed that while consuming at a café, they accidentally broke a cup saucer and were asked by the shop to pay 3,000 yuan in compensation. The incident quickly sparked widespread discussion online. The shop claimed the saucer was a genuine Hermès item but never produced valid proof. The final negotiated outcome was that the customer and the staff member each bore half of the compensation, but the netizen still had doubts about how it was handled and asked the public whether they should call the police and pursue judicial procedures. Around issues such as whether the compensation amount was reasonable, whether the shop should proactively remind customers of the value of its utensils, and how to identify genuine products, netizens engaged in extensive discussion. [more…]

Recently, food safety issues in the coffee and milk tea industries have been exposed one after another, leaving many beverage-loving consumers feeling uneasy. On May 6, Yihuatang made trending searches due to the use of expired and moldy ingredients, and on the same day it appeared twice in Weibo trending searches—a woman in Foshan, Guangdong, found a 7-centimeter-long machine part in her takeout milk tea. After complaints and negotiations, Yihuatang eventually compensated the consumer 1,000 yuan. Meanwhile, some Yihuatang stores in Zhengzhou were also exposed by the media for serious food safety hazards, with employees even saying, "As long as it doesn't kill you, it's fine." This series of incidents once again reminds us that low prices cannot be used as a shield for food safety, and brands must take responsibility for supervising their franchise stores. [more…]

In May of this year, a tourist discovered two specialty drinks at a coffee shop in the Harbin Pharmaceutical Group No. 6 Factory scenic area — Blue Bottle Latte and Zinc Wish Latte — which had been supplemented with calcium gluconate and zinc gluconate oral solutions, respectively. Since these two oral solutions are Class A non-prescription drugs, adding them directly to food products is suspected of violating the Food Safety Law. After a consumer reported the matter to 12315, the local market supervision bureau opened a case on May 14. The consumer subsequently received multiple phone calls from the bureau and eventually signed documents in August confirming receipt of compensation and a reward totaling 2,000 yuan, which was donated to the Hebei Red Cross. The incident sparked heated discussion online, with some questioning whether the consumer was making a mountain out of a molehill, while others insisted that food safety is no small matter. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

Recently, a cat café in Guangzhou experienced an incident where a customer was bitten by a cat in the store. After seeking medical treatment, the customer demanded more than three thousand yuan from the business for medical expenses and emotional distress, but the owner refused. The business claimed that the risks had been clearly stated in the group-buy package and in-store notices, and that the customer, being an adult, should not hold the store fully responsible; the customer side argued that the business had failed to fulfill its safety obligations. Both sides stuck to their own accounts, and the negotiation reached a deadlock. The incident has attracted widespread attention: when someone is scratched or bitten by a pet in a cat café, how exactly should liability be divided? As coffee lovers, when enjoying the pleasure of petting cats and drinking coffee, how can we protect our own safety? Front Street Coffee reminds you that choosing a legitimate cat café and understanding the relevant guidelines is the best way to enjoy your time interacting with cats. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

During the G20 summit in Brazil, Luckin Coffee signed a memorandum of understanding with the Brazilian Export and Investment Promotion Agency, planning to purchase a cumulative 240,000 tons of Brazilian coffee beans between 2025 and 2029, with a total value of 10 billion RMB, setting Luckin's largest procurement record. At the same time, Brazil's coffee industry is facing production uncertainty brought by extreme weather: although the current sales pace has accelerated and exports have hit a record high, drought and fires have already damaged the new crop season, multiple institutions have lowered production expectations, and international coffee futures prices have continued to climb. This article will outline the key points of the agreement, Brazil's sales dynamics, and the impact of weather on the supply and demand landscape. [more…]

Recently, a Luckin Coffee employee posted footage on social media showing a store destroying co-branded packaging overnight, with trash bins full of unopened cup sleeves and takeaway cups, quickly sparking discussions among netizens about waste and environmental protection. According to the employee, on the eve of the end of each co-branding campaign, stores must cut and destroy remaining materials under surveillance, including previously co-branded Chengdu Cultural Tourism small panda keychains. Some netizens compared this with Cotti Coffee's approach, arguing that continuing to use expired packaging materials both reduces waste and gives customers surprises; others with knowledge of the matter pointed out that the destruction may be forced by the licensing period granted by the co-branding partner, and using them beyond the period could lead to breach-of-contract compensation. Behind this controversy lies the dilemma of materials management and intellectual property compliance amid the co-branding boom. [more…]

Professional coffee knowledge exchange For more coffee bean information, please follow Coffee Workshop (WeChat public account: cafe_style) For more specialty coffee beans, please add the personal WeChat of Front Street Coffee, WeChat ID: qjcoffeex Recently, a consumer reported that a Häagen-Dazs store in Suzhou listed espresso at 20 yuan on its menu but actually charged 23 yuan at checkout. The store explained that there is a price difference between dine-in and takeout, but the menu title clearly states "Takeout Beverage Menu" and shows only one price without indicating that takeout incurs an extra charge, making this explanation hard to believe. Since opening the world's first coffee store in Shanghai in 2014, Häagen-Dazs has continued to expand in China's coffee market, and its total number of stores has now reached 482. In addition to this pricing dispute, the brand was previously reported by the EU over food safety issues. [more…]

The latest report from the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia (FNC) shows that the country's coffee production reached 742,000 bags in April, an increase of more than 30% year-on-year, though down from March. Despite favorable weather that helped flowering, coffee farmers still face multiple challenges, including aging trees, frequent pest outbreaks and fluctuations in international prices. At the same time, escalating violence by anti-government armed groups in Cauca province has brought uncertainty to this important producing region. Colombia's coffee production for the 2024/25 season is expected to reach 12.4 million bags, with exports also expected to rebound. This article will analyze key points including production, exports, planting structure and policy support, and will also examine the potential impact of the security situation in producing regions on the coffee industry. [more…]

Recently, a netizen complained on social media that Manner Coffee's pay-raise assessment system is too strict, claiming that to earn the high salary advertised on its recruitment page, one must pass exams comparable in difficulty to SCA intermediate or even advanced barista certification, which resonated with many baristas. What kind of assessment threshold lies behind Manner's high pay? Compared with other brands, what makes its promotion system so difficult? This article takes you through it. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as one of the representatives of specialty coffee, is now mired in operational difficulties due to unpaid wages. Although employees at its Shanghai IFC store report to work on time, the company's wage arrears and cut-off of supplies have made it impossible to prepare drinks, forcing them to post a notice in Chinese, English, Korean, and Japanese to politely decline customer orders. From unpaid supplier payments to labor arbitration by former employees, from the founder being repeatedly subject to consumption restrictions to more than sixty economic disputes, this former coffee star brand is experiencing an unprecedented crisis. Many loyal customers have expressed regret and lament, while others have called on the brand to handle employee rights and interests with dignity. [more…]